Les 5 du Vin

5 journalistes parlent du vin


2 Commentaires



Champomy – L’Orginal (I am Original):
Looking for a non-alcoholic sparkling fruit juice to offer as an apéro we found Champomy in our local Intermarché. As the brand name suggests this is sparkling apple juice, whose bottle is closed with a muselet and sparkling wine cork.

I was intrigued by the Champomy name. Surely the CIVC’s legal hounds wouldn’t let this pass. A quick Google search showed that the CIVC and the INAO had indeed taken Pernod Ricard as well as Orangina Schweppes and Schweppes international over Champomy.

The Champony brand name was first registered in France in 1988 with several variations on the name registered soon after. In January 1991 there was agreement between Pernod Ricard and the CIVC that in promoting Champomy there would be no mention of Champagne and in return the CIVC would not object to the brand name.

Later the CIVC and the INAO, concluding that Pernod Ricard had not kept their side of the agreement and that Champony was being associated with Champagne, bought an legal action to have the brand names annulled.

However, at a hearing before the Cour de Cassation on 7th July 2009, the demands of the CIVC and INAO were rejected on the grounds that in the intervening years Pernod Ricard – ‘a fait émerger un univers propre autour de son produit’. Champony now had its own established reputation as a celebratory drink for kids that that meant that it wouldn’t be confused with Champagne.

This was an interesting judgment that indicates that providing a brand name was well established, even though might appear to lead to potential confusion with Champagne, a legal action by the CIVC would be likely to fail.

It is also a reminder that the CIVC does not appear to have a great deal of success in its legal jousts with kids’ drinks. It recently failed to convince the Spanish Supreme Court to ban Champín – ‘Bebida para fiestas infantiles’.

For the record Champomy is a pleasant, non-alcoholic cider-like, fizzy drink but is quite sweet – demi-sec.





Auteur : Les 5 du Vin

Journalistes en vin

2 réflexions sur “Champomy

  1. Jim, may I suggest that there is a size aspect to this question as well. Pernod Ricard is a large and powerful company and can afford the best lawyers in this field. Poor Champagne Jayne is not quite in the same league. Bog vs big often means a deal. Big vs small usually means big wins. Am I being simplistic here?


  2. David – although the size of the parties involved is indeed likely to be an important factor. In all three instances the CIVC went to court and effectively in all three cases lost. With Champomy they lost in a French court, the Spanish Supreme Court rejected the Champín complaint and they failed in Australia to force Champagne Jayne to give up her moniker, although on a couple of lesser points their action was successful. In terms of the financial consequences clearly the hardship for Jayne Powell is far more significant.


Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )


Connexion à %s