I always greatly enjoyed the (now) old TV series Monty Python’s Flying Circus. Laughing is fun (obviously!) and also I think very salutary in this sometimes too serious world. Being over serious about wine is a danger zone into which we too often fall, some of us more than others perhaps, which is why I want to recommend for this weekend the web site and other media called Fake Booze. Here is the link :
The presentation of this site goes like this : « Fake Booze is a site for grown-ups who like a drink and can tell fact from fiction. If you’re underage, don’t like alcohol or struggle with irony, maybe read something else. »
I particularly enjoyed these two pieces, just examples of several that are worth a read, I think Jim in particular will enjoy the first one (maybe he actually wrote it himself):
Government unveils controversial new hospitality dress code
and now for another one in full :
Tasting notes to be replaced by interpretive dance routines
The drinks world could be facing up to a future without tasting notes after an innocent social media post went rogue.
‘I just put out a tweet last Friday for a bit of fun,’ said long term booze hack, Boo Zhack. ‘Now people are saying that I’ve killed tasting notes stone dead.
‘It’s terrible to think I might be responsible for single-handedly destroying an art form that has given us so much eye-wateringly beautiful prose down the centuries.
‘Or at least eye-watering prose.’
The trade speaks
Zhack’s open-ended question – ‘which terms would you like to see banned from drinks writing for ever’ received 25,000 replies in 24 hours, before she deleted her account.
According to Zhack, her tweet attracted replies from ‘journalists, PRs, winemakers, marketers, distillers, brand managers, influencers, and a huge number of people with no discernible reason for existing at all.
‘It was a very representative cross section of the drinks world.’
Adjective = badjective
The more than 2000 terms which the respondents felt should be banned forthwith included ‘aged’, ‘tasty’, ‘drinkable’, ‘elegant’, ‘refined’, ‘gluggable’, ‘smashable’, ‘quaffable’, ‘enjoyable’, ‘fruity’, ‘linear’, ‘mineral’, ‘complex’, ‘developed’, ‘crafted’, ‘unique’, ‘feminine’, ‘masculine’ and ‘interesting’.
‘Essentially, there weren’t many words left by the time Twatter had finished,’ said Zhack, ‘and no adjectives at all, which is a definite disadvantage when you’re attempting to describe something.’
‘I see the wine. The wine is red…’
Educational bodies, however, were quick to say that they would respect the new, more minimalist stance on language.
‘It means that tasting notes aren’t likely to go much beyond ‘I tried the wine. It was red’ or ‘the whisky is strong’,’ said Rote Lerning of the Wine and Spirit Evisceration Trust (WSET). ‘But that won’t make any difference to us.
‘That’s all you need to pass most of our courses anyway.’
For its part, the global drinks writing body, the Group of Boozy Scribblers, Hacks and Industry Taste Explainers (GOBSHITE) said it would be recommending that its members use less contentious ways of communicating their thoughts in future.
‘The written word is clearly far too imprecise and controversial a way to talk about drinks,’ said GOBSHITE’s president, Parker Roberts. ‘So we’re asking our members to use interpretive dance, mime or emojis instead.
‘And frankly they probably make as much sense to your average punter as a tasting note anyway.’
Roberts added that he was confident that standards would not be affected by the changes.
‘Partly this is because our members are adaptable, intelligent and highly professional,’ he told Fake Booze.
‘But mostly it’s because no-one every reads anything we write anyway.’