Les 5 du Vin

5 journalistes parlent du vin

1855.com – renewed investigation as new judge appointed + need for wider inquiry

4 Commentaires

 

A rather late news flash:
Unfortunately I missed this most recent development in the long-running 1855.com saga and am indebted to my Les 5 du Vin colleague, Hervé Lalau, for bringing this report by Jérôme Baudouin in the Revue du Vin de France back in early July 2017 to my attention.

On 6th June 2017 the President of the Chambre d’Instruction de la Cour d’Appel de Paris decided to fire the judge, who had been in charge of the enquiry, and to appoint a new one. The President was not impressed that after nearly two years the investigation appeared to be getting nowhere. Hopefully this second judge will be more effective and that there is a proper and thorough investigation into the scandal of 1855.com and its two principals – Emeric Sauty de Chalon and Fabien Hyon. 

When 1855 was forced into liquidation it had debts of over 40 million euros and millions of bottles, many of them Grand Cru Bordeaux, that were never delivered to their clients.

There has long been a strong suspicion that Hyon and Sauty de Chalon have had protection in high places. It looks as though this may have continued. 

 First two paragraphs of the RVF Report:

Affaire 1855.com : le juge dessaisi,
l’enquête redémarre

Tournant décisif dans l’affaire 1855.com, le président de la Chambre d’Instruction de la Cour d’Appel de Paris a décidé de dessaisir de son enquête le juge enquêtant sur le site frauduleux depuis 2015 pour la confier à une nouvelle juge qui va reprendre l’enquête.

Alors que depuis deux ans, l’enquête semblait s’enliser dans les méandres de l’inertie judiciaire (voir La RVF n°613 de juin 2017), l’affaire a pris un tournant surprenant et décisif, le 6 juin dernier, lors d’une audience intense de la Chambre d’Instruction de la Cour d’Appel de Paris.

 

A more general enquiry needed

Arnaque

How come the 1855.com scandal was able continue for so long? It was known for years that the company was in trouble – failing to deliver its clients’ wines and building up debts. These problems dated back at least to 2006/7 when 1855 was caught out by the rapid increase in price of the 2005 Bordeaux vintage as many of their sales were en primeur and their ‘business model’ involved taking clients’ money during the en primeur campaign but only buying the wines when they were actually in bottle.

Furthermore with debts of over 40 million euros where did the 1855 clients’ money go? Into whose pockets?

Numerous complaints were made to La Répression des Fraudes (DGCCRF) with no apparent action taken.  In early August 2012 France 2 broadcast a programme about 1855 with the clear headline ‘Arnaque’ – fraud. Clearly they felt there was no risk of the company successfully suing them for libel.

Why was 1855.com allowed to continue until January 2015 to build up debts of over 40 million euros and with huge numbers of wine orders never delivered? There should be an inquiry into why this this allowed to happen. Did the two principals – Emeric Sauty de Chalon and Fabien Hyon – have friends high up in the French state who provided protection? Why has the enquiry into the company made so little progress over the past two years that a new judge has had to be appointed?

Jim Budd

 

Auteur : Les 5 du Vin

Journalistes en vin

4 réflexions sur “1855.com – renewed investigation as new judge appointed + need for wider inquiry

  1. In France, the judges at the Tribunal du Commerce are not professional judges but businessmen themselves; and at times, one can question their impartiality. The concept of having tradesmen judging commercial disputes is not bad in itself, but when the protection of consumers is a stake, like in the 1855 case, it shows its limits.

    What is questionable also is the fact that even if they are « fired » from a case after having showed at best incompetence, at worst a bias, or that there is a real suspicion of a conflict of interests, there is no sanction against the judges.

    Aimé par 1 personne

  2. Cela paraît invraisemblable que cette affaire de droit commun soit jugée en tribunal de commerce. Même si le juge ne peut être poursuivi cela ne devrait pas empêcher de faire une enquête « en bande organisée » et démonter cette énorme affaire et visiblement les nombreuses protections qui ont eu lieu. Il y a là-dedans de quoi mettre une dizaine de gugusses en prison …
    Je reste tout également surpris de voir le nombre de personnes qui sont restés dans la nasse. J’y étais et les commentaires alarmants étant si nombreux, durant si longtemps, j’ai pu m’échapper petit à petit en échangeant mes avoirs contre des vins immédiatement disponibles …

    Aimé par 1 personne

  3. Pingback: 1855.com – renewed investigation as new judge appointed + need for wider inquiry | Wine Planet

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s